Twas the Night for the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Day might the Zombie Apocalypse arrive on Xmas? You’ll bet on it! (Image:

Every year punters place bets on whether or not they are going to awaken up to a blanket that is snowy their streets on Christmas morning. It’s the old romantic in each of us that dreams about this backdrop that is scenic a joyous day, surrounded by our liked ones and overeating with all the current Christmas trimmings, cannibalizing and spreading our infectious zombie disease. Wait. What?

Betting on Zombies

Although some are wagering on a white Christmas, UK bookmaking giant Ladbrokes is offering chances of 2000/1 on this xmas being the beginning of the Zombie Apocalypse. That is a nice, festive idea to have, and beats the chances they provide for football team Crystal Palace winning the Premier League in 2010 at 5000/1. Explore harmful gambling.

‘we have been quite confident that the chances of a Zombie Apocalypse at 2000/1 are correct, and although the public should exert caution over the Christmas period, they need to not be unduly concerned about the undead rising up to attack and eat the living,’ announced Alex Donohue, a spokesman for the Ladbrokes bookmaker.

Odds on a white Christmas currently stand at 5/1, which is a much better chance compared to those offered on the doomsday coming associated with the undead, and you’re more likely in order to claim your winnings after a bit of snow instead of having to fight your way through the zombie hordes to collect your reward. Although you’d be pretty smug with yourself if you have that bet right, that’s for sure.

While the chance to bet on the Zombie Apocalypse is a lot more than likely a nice bit of publicity for Ladbrokes, Sean web Page zombie expert and founder of this Ministry of Zombies has urged the public to prepare for the worst.

‘The public is often interested in the chances of a white Christmas time, however they should be more concerned by the increasing likelihood of a Zombie Apocalypse,’ reported Page, suggesting, maybe, that he’s nipping during the whiskey by having a bit too much alacrity.

‘The many likely time for an outbreak is through the busy holiday season as people save money time in large groups, making it easier for the zombie virus to distribute, triggering the Apocalypse,’ Page included. Evidently, he’s seen it happen prior to.

Bets That Are Dead On

2000/1 seems a bit too low for the chances of a zombie epidemic really, but this isn’t the time that is first has offered the possiblity to place wagers on the Apocalypse, while they also offered similar odds regarding the outbreak of a undead siege on December 21st 2012, because of all of the hype around the end of the Mayan calendar to which doomsday ‘enthusiasts’ were clinging hopefully in expectation of these impending doom.

Strangely enough, Ladbrokes are additionally offering much more likely chances of 500/1 in the risk of Prince Harry getting hitched to Miley Cyrus, however the smart money in this instance would probably be in the zombies, despite the fact you know, end of the world and all that that you would be unlikely to recoup any wager due to the. So less ‘nothing was stirring’ and more ‘watch out for the bloodthirsty, flesh-eating undead away from door.’

MGM Clears Hurdles in Massachusetts; Gaming Commission Still Must Okay

MGM Resorts is almost through the regulatory gauntlet in Massachusetts for their Springfield casino project (Image: Artist’s rendering of casino)

Simply once you thought no body would ever be good sufficient for Massachusetts’ insanely gaming that is fastidious, the MGM actually earned their approbation this week. The commission’s investigative arm which may have its very own TV show called ‘MGC P.I.’ recommended that MGM Resorts be located suitable to move ahead with their Springfield casino task, with the caveat that MGM executives find a way to talk their way away from a few lingering concerns for the commission, concerns that came to light once the commission conducted its regulatory background check on the casino company.

Cleared for Lose

As soon as we say ‘lengthy’, we aren’t whistling Dixie; the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement invested the past 10 months looking through every speck of dust that anyone associated with MGM ever came across, and amazingly noted that they found nothing that would automatically disqualify the group from setting up house within the pristine state of Massachusetts.

But it’s not really a done deal yet; the five Massachusetts Gaming Commissioners still get to have the last term on whether or not MGM are able to do business within their neck associated with the woods. But if they give their papal blessing towards the company, MGM will then manage to submit their last application as the best western Massachusetts casino permit that will likely be provided; and since they’re the only remaining applicant, that would seem to be a pretty complete deal.

The actual only real tiny ding that the Bureau could dig up after almost a year of searching all documented in a 500-page report on the topic was MGM’s means of dealing previous executive board member Terry Christensen, whom in 2008 was convicted on costs relating to the wiretapping of company mogul Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife when Kerkorian was involved in a child support fight that is gruesome.

‘Despite his indictment, resignation from the Board and ultimate conviction, Christensen was permitted to engage, on a repeated and prolonged basis, in some delicate and non-public corporate things of MGM Resorts … including their attendance at Board meetings,’ scolded the report.

In this dance of mea culpa, MGM CEO James Murren took the position of penitent profligate with all the Commission at this week’s hearing, noting that it absolutely was a mistake for the company to allow bad boy Christensen to carry on in almost any capacity with the organization.

‘I exercised poor judgment,’ stated Murren, who had previously been the outfit’s CFO when all this transpired. ‘It was a bad concept from the very beginning. None of us should have had any experience of (Christensen).’

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

More Executive Contrition

Murren had beenn’t the only person to throw himself on the mercy associated with court, as current MGM board member (and mind of its review committee) Roland Hernandez made a point to inform commissioners that protocols are now in place within the company to guarantee there will likely to be no repeats with this poor process that is decision-making.

All that was then left for the commish to deal with were a couple of concerns they had about some MGM transactions in Macau; mostly, these centered around a former partnership with Chinese company mogul (and child of casino mega-mogul Stanley Ho) Pansy Ho. Ho had been deemed unsuitable as somebody during a 2010 New Jersey hearing that is regulatory the problem, so when such, MGM had to unload a 50 percent stake in an Atlantic City casino there, simply to keep their nose clean. The allegations were that Ho’s father Stanley had had transactions with some Chinese gangs, a definite ‘no-no’ in today’s regulatory video gaming world.

Hernandez had to the Massachusetts commissioners that Ms. Ho had been included with MGM completely separate from her father, and that she was mainly involved in non-gaming business tasks regarding their MGM Macau property. Hernandez also noted that other, less finicky, states had been okay with the Ho interaction; namely, Nevada and Maryland, both of which had no nagging problem along with it. He additionally noted that New Jersey has now softened their own stance, and may allow MGM back in the fold in Atlantic City.

The panel should rule later this the commission’s chair Stephen Crosby won’t say which way the wind is blowing, but noted he appreciated the MGM execs’ openness in dealing with these issues week.

But even being truly the only applicant and regardless if cleared by the commission this it’s still not a 100 percent slam-dunk for MGM Resorts week.

‘One applicant or 10, we are going to hold their feet to the fire to ensure we have a really good application,’ Crosby advised reporters throughout a hearing break.

Setback for PokerStars as brand New Jersey Bars Licensing for 2 Years

PokerStars got a smack from New Jersey regulators this when they put them in licensing limbo for the next two years week

If there’s one name that has dominated the American online poker market over the decade that is last it has to be PokerStars. However if you’re residing in New Jersey, you mustn’t expect you’ll be playing on a site operated by the poker giant any time quickly.

Two Years in Limbo

The New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement made the decision this to suspend the review of PokerStars’ application for an online gambling license for two years, effectively locking the company out of the state’s online poker marketplace for that time period week.

‘The Division of Gaming Enforcement has determined that the use of Rational Services Limited (PokerStars) casino service industry licensure (CSIE) would be held in a suspended status for a period of two years,’ the Division said in a statement.

However, the door just isn’t completely closed on PokerStars.

‘The Division, within that duration, may think about a demand for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated, at which time the Division’s investigation of PokerStars and its particular entities that are affiliated associated individuals are resumed to assess suitability.’

Bad Company, Bad Actor

Although PokerStars has long settled the federal government to its case and admitted no wrongdoing as a part of that settlement New Jersey regulators still have actually some issues with the company. Chief among those appears to be founder Isai Scheinberg to their association, that has been under federal indictment since Ebony Friday. Scheinberg isn’t U.S. citizen, and hasn’t come to your U.S. to face those charges, to nobody’s shock.

While this is a huge loss for PokerStars, it also marks a giant win for its competitors in the nj-new Jersey market. As we reported recently, the site run by PartyPoker jointly with the Borgata Casino currently features a 50 percent share of the state’s poker marketplace, with the Caesars/888 World variety of Poker site not far behind. Those two companies could have been overshadowed easily by the PokerStars site which will have now winner casino birthday bonus been operated in conjunction with Resorts Casino and were hoping that their mind start would give them a bonus that will allow them to stay competitive. Now, they’ll have at least two years to build up brand name commitment, something that PokerStars could have a time that is difficult, if so when they have been finally licensed for New Jersey’s online marketplace.

PokerStars ended up being predictably not thrilled by the news, though they noted that the state’s decision could improvement in the future.

‘We are disappointed that the N.J. Division of Gaming Enforcement has suspended the review of our application at this right time,’ said PokerStars spokesman Eric Hollreiser in a statement. ‘We note that the DGE will resume the overview of our application if our circumstances change. We will stay in open dialogue with the DGE and certainly will update them on alterations in our situation as they occur.’

This wasn’t the very first result that is disappointing PokerStars in nj. Formerly, the ongoing company had tried purchasing the Atlantic Club Casino, only to have that deal break apart over questions about whether regulators would approve the purchase. That choice had been also costly, as PokerStars lost about $11 million they had spent on casino expenses a total that was supposed to be used to your eventual $15 million cost.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you accept our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy, which we encourage you to review.

Dismiss Privacy Settings
Close Bitnami banner