California State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer, whose brand new online poker bill is far more comprehensive than previous drafts, would welcome racetracks and PokerStars into the Golden State video gaming market also.
A California that is new online bill, sponsored by State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), happens to be on the table to oppose the bill introduced by fellow State Assemblyman Mike Gatto in December.
The Sawyer-Jones bill, AB 167, seeks to establish ‘a proper structure that is regulatory place that provides safe and compliant internet poker access,’ the assemblyman announced yesterday.
So how do the two brand new bills compare? And much more to the point, how exactly does the new Jones-Sawyer bill compare with his past bill, AB2291, which foundered regarding the rocks of last year’s legislative session?
No Bad Actors
Jones-Sawyer said at the conclusion of the 2014 session that the new, revised bill would be a high concern for 2015, and indicated that this time, the ‘bad actor’ language would be softened. The non-severable bad star clauses of AB229 shown to be always a sticking point for stakeholders, and caused an important schism between those who wanted PokerStars in the marketplace and those who didn’t.
As expected, AB 167 seems to have eliminated those bad star provisions, apparently clearing the means for PokerStars to enter a regulated California market. Those precluded from applying for a internet poker license, states the bill, consist of:
‘The individual [who] has contemptuously defied an investigative that is legislative, or other official investigative human anatomy of a state or of the usa or a foreign jurisdiction, when that body is engaged into the investigation of crimes relating to poker, official corruption related to poker activities, or criminal profiteering activity or organized crime, as defined in area l 86.2 of this Penal Code.’
The bill goes on to clarify a key position that could directly affect PokerStars possible entry into the Golden State market, given its previously vilified owners vs. its new, ‘clean slate’ ones.
‘ The individual [who] is convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of the felony consisting of either having accepted a bet over the Internet in breach of United States or California law, or having aided or abetted that unlawful activity.’
Note the utilization associated with the word ‘person,’ which suggests that PokerStars, by divesting itself of its previous owners, against whom there were outstanding DOJ indictments, would have the ability to take part in the California on line market unscathed.
Anti-PokerStars Coalition Denounces Language
The language is in sharp contrast with that of final year’s bill from Jones-Sawyer, which proposed to exclude ‘any brand or company name, including any derivative brand with the exact same or similar wording, or any trade or solution mark, pc software, technology, operational system, customer information, or other data acquired, derived, or developed directly or indirectly from any operation that has accepted a bet or engaged in a financial deal regarding such bet from any individual in the United States on any form of Web video gaming after December 31, 2006.’
If Jones-Sawyer thinks his bill will sail through with the backing regarding the stakeholders, however, he has another think coming, as the anti-PokerStars coalition that is tribal no time in denouncing this language.
‘There is much for tribes to dislike about that bill,’ said Pechanga Chairman Mark Macarro. ‘Our company is disappointed that the bill disregards important principles from a broad coalition of respected tribes and card spaces that help avoid corporations and entities that previously violated federal law from profiting from tainted software, brands, and databases derived from illegal activity.’
Photo Finish for Racetracks and Liquidity
Other major news for AB 167 may be the inclusion of California racetracks in a post-regulation landscape, which many felt was indeed unjustly ignored by previous bills. The sharing of liquidity along with other states, expressly forbidden in preceding draft bills, seems to be on the menu this right time, and there’s also a suggestion that players on unlicensed sites could be prosecuted.
The permit fee would cost $10 million, with a set that is tax-rate 8.5 percent of gross gaming revenue. When language has been agreed upon, the bill will require two-thirds associated with the vote to pass.
New Bill Would Decriminalize Fantasy Sports in Washington
State Senator Pam Roach introduced a bill that will legalize fantasy activities games in the state of Washington. (Image: PamRoach.com)
Their state of Washington is known for having a number of the harshest gambling that is online in the United States.
But these laws go even more than many realize: Washington also considers fantasy sports to be described as a form of gambling, and thus players who put money into their online fantasy sports leagues are technically breaking the law, and could even be charged by having a felony beneath the exact same laws that criminalize online poker and casino games.
That’s something which many officials that are local want to be changed.
With an estimated 500,000 residents in the state fantasy that is playing games, State Senator Pam Roach (R-31st District) says it’s time for you to reclassify the contests being a game of skill instead than as luck-based gambling.
‘Our state sees fantasy football as being a game of chance a felony crime,’ Roach said. ‘Congress has long considered fantasy football to be a game of ability. My bill will change the state’s definition.’
Washington Residents Restricted from Fantasy Sports Sites
Now, many major online fantasy sports outlets block Washington residents from participating on their sites, including top day-to-day dream sites like FanDuel and DraftKings.
Conventional season leagues that are long web sites like ESPN.com are usually open to Washington residents, however they are typically ineligible to win awards.
The situation is that many states see dream activities as a casino game of skill.
But the Washington State Gambling Commission still sees luck being a big enough factor to classify it as gambling under present state laws.
‘There’s always the chance the Seattle Seahawks will return from two touchdowns down with two minutes left,’ stated commission chairman Chris Stearns, talking about the Seahawks’ improbable comeback into the NFC Championship game weekend that is last. ‘Whereas in many states, the proven fact that you’ve spent all this time poring over stats and making your spreadsheets that are own that’s the skill part, and that weighs most greatly.’
Sports Betting Would Remain Illegal
Underneath the proposed law, there would remain a prohibition on placing bets on the result of real-world events that are sporting.
However, both daily and season-long fantasy recreations will be expressly legal, even for real cash play.
The bill appears to have better chances than a bill that is similar would decriminalize and regulate online poker; the dream activities bill has bi-partisan support and it has found lots of sponsors on both edges of the aisle.
Companion bills have already been introduced in both the House of Representatives and the State Senate.
The Fantasy supports the legalization effort Sports Trade Association, a market group based out of Chicago.
According to the combined group, more than 41 million people in America and Canada play fantasy sports, and nearly half of them perform for real money.
‘We think citizens of Washington is in a position to have fun with the full array of fantasy sports contests offered in 45 other states and become able to win prizes in free contests offered by major media businesses,’ said association chairman Peter Schoenke in a statement.
Washington is certainly one of five states in which residents are typically blocked from playing on day-to-day fantasy sports sites.
As we recently reported, momentum is increasing in several of these states to legalize games that are such recently, a Montana lawmaker introduced a bill that would allow residents to take part in contests where the entry charge was $100 or less.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Rejects Kenosha Casino Project
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has rejected a casino that is proposed Kenosha, with some saying the move may be related to his presidential aspirations. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has put the kibosh on a proposed casino plan, saying that building the venue would be too costly simply to taxpayers to be allowed.
In a statement, Walker said that the continuing state has been liable for up to $100 million towards the Potawatomi tribe, which has a casino in Milwaukee, due to agreements between your tribe and the state.
The agreement between Wisconsin and the Potawatomi tribe, the state is responsible for reimbursing the tribe for any revenue lost to other casinos that open in the state under the compact that governs.
‘After a comprehensive review of the possible economic impact of the proposed Kenosha casino project, the risk to the state’s taxpayers is too great,’ Walker stated in a statement. ‘Due to the compacts negotiated by Governor Doyle, the current cost to taxpayers of approving the proposed casino task is up to $100 million while the long-lasting economic hit to the state budget would be a potential loss of vast sums of bucks.’
The new casino, which would have expense about $800 million to build, would be to be a joint endeavor between the Menominee Tribe and complex Rock, which would have been in charge of running the casino. The task was approved in 2013 by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, but it still required approval from the governor of Wisconsin before it could get forward.
Casino Supporters See Politics Behind Decision
The Menominee Tribe saw other motivations behind his decision while Walker said the rejection was a way to protect residents of the state from a financial obligation.
‘One tribe, the Forest County Potawatomi and one goal of Governor Walker, the presidency, has resulted in a ‘no’ for the people,’ the tribe stated in a statement.
Many governmental observers believe that Walker could be planning for a run at the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016. ladbrokes casino table club The Menominee statement suggested that Walker’s decision was made to placate conservatives who’re in opposition to casino gambling. One prominent Iowa conservative, Tom Coates, recently published a letter to Walker urging him to reject the casino. That page was also finalized by 600 potential caucus voters from Iowa.
Regardless of motivation behind Walker’s decision, numerous locals in Kenosha had been disappointed in your decision.
‘ There were individuals ready to go to work down here, and that is perhaps not likely to take place now,’ Kenosha Mayor Keith Bosman told WTMJ.
With Kenosha away from the Way, Beloit Hopes for Federal Attention
It is possible that Kenosha’s loss could be Beloit’s gain. Supporters of a Ho-Chunk Nation casino within the town hope that the rejection for the Menominee casino could mean that their project will pass through federal now review more quickly.
The city and the tribe experienced a preliminary deal in place since 2012, but officials say they certainly were told that the Bureau of Indian Affairs were delaying a determination in part because of the Kenosha proposal. The Ho-Chunk were publicly in opposition to the Kenosha task.
Regardless of the rejection, however, the Menominee say they shall soldier on.
‘We must remember all of the Menominee country has overcome much more than 10,000 years,’ the tribe said in a declaration. ‘ We are going to continue to flourish being a Nation and will continue to be honorable partners for Indian Tribes in Wisconsin and around the Nation.’